Message posted by Mark at 12:12 am, Wed 2nd Jan 2008
New policies within the workplace with reference to flexibility are creating RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM. Deregulated shift systems are creating so much inequality that it opposes all what Labour stands
for. Work life Balance, Flexible Working Rotas, Self Rostering do not provide good value for money and explains many of the recent lapses in public services recently. Who Benefits? The Government,
whose programme of flexibility and increased flexiblity in the new year will devalue the work of unions, reducing their influence in the workplace, in which workers are only concerned by"Whats in it
for me". This policy will weaken Labour in 2008, no doubt at all. Serious thought and good policy has to be implemented. Ignorance will be very damaging. Deregulated services and working conditions,
creates competition and champions private industry in to public services. There is more choice of a service provider now than the standard public or private. A very intellectual method of creating
markets within the public sector. Demand creates a supply of private, public, charity, voluntary and community. There is however one other, which could revolutionise community and then society??
Controlled wage labour, increased co-operation, changing landscapes etc and socially utopian. One idea that can be managed controlled and co-rdinated. Small ripples within a community lead to larger
ripples in society. Rights and responsibilities and Third Way politics is old politics. Proven beyond all reasonable doubt at this time that PARENTS, CHILDREN for example, of new independent schools
have no rights, where emphasis is more on responsibility to the ethos of the school. Patients will have no rights only a reponsibility to be cost effective to the tax payer, by changing their
lifestyle. Placing a condition on service will not be free treatment at the point of need but helps more markets to thrive in health at the point of greed. Listening is all very important. Good ideas
can promote well being, if they are the right ones and principled Happy New Year
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Nicholas at 10:26 am, Sun 6th Jan 2008
Dear Mark having worked within the public sector for over two decades i would like to think that the service we provide is exempliarey. i t o have concerns that the private sector want to monopolise
the public purse, after all a private companys primary concern is to make money where my service,s concern is to provide a service. i have concerns for what you say about RADICAL INDIVIDUALISM as
this can be devisife. Flexible Working Rotas, Self Rostering and the third of the holy trinity you missed was working from home can have a negitive effect on staff teams but a equallity for all is
just that equal. we spend alot of our time championing the rights of individuals the we have forgoten our rights. i have worked of public services and contribued to the social landscape beliving that
it is beeter now than ever.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Mark at 09:44 pm, Sun 6th Jan 2008
Dear Nicholas, Could I kindly ask what public service you work for? Flexible working denies the full employment rights of individuals. Working more than 48 Hours a week is contrary to the European
Working Time Directive. Flexibility denies the RIGHTS of all workers to enjoy standardised meal breaks, the RIGHT to finish on an agreed time, the RIGHT to overtime pay instead of working for
TOIL,the right to representation from your union. "IF ALL WORKERS WANT PRIVATISATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES, THEN CARRY ON CHANGING AND SIGNING OVER ONTO INDIVIDUAL WORKING CONTRACTS WITH YOUR
EMPLOYER. Private Contractors love deregulation, flexibility and all the conditions that go with it. Carry on being flexible. You will eventually have no rights because you have agreed for them to be
taking away, voluntarily. REGULATION TO DEREGULATION There becomes a saturation point when single parents, working parents, parents with children under six, parents with children under sixteen, part
time workers, reduced hours workers,people working from home on a computer, etc are fully utilised, who is then discriminated against in the workplace. Who is left to pick up the pieces? It would not
be politically incorrect to say it because I will be challenged by a regulated policy that is intentionally put in place to control the majority from creating tyranny in being flexible. The
Government have ensureed Inequality by making Flexible Working Legal. Who benefits? It is not the worker. They are sacrificing the rights that have been fought for by unions for decade after decade
at the stroke of a pen. Flexibility benefits managers who cannot manage, the workers manage the sick and non effectives, they manage the shortfalls. So why are senior managers increasing when you
don't need them.If you wish to make savings Mr Brown, look no further than the Senior Managers in the public services who are in charge of huge budgets who create posts, vacancies at the drop of the
hat(usually their friends) and you turn a blind eye to it. WHY? Pure Weberarian bureaucracy. Deregulation breeds inequality. Regulation champions equality. Labour policies at the moment does not add
up Beaware of the following words Flexibility! Quality! Choice! Benchmarking! Market Testing! Downsizing! All Double speak. Words that Labour have adopted to drive home alternative providers to
public service provision. A great Anglo Saxon Economic Model. A great way for workers to champion Conservatism. If unions wish to save jobs and create public services fit for the 21st Century I send
you this message y you REGULATE! REGULATE! REGULATE Think again Mr Brown, you are being advised very poorly indeed.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Tom at 04:03 pm, Tue 1st Jan 2008
Great stuff. We've got a lot to do in the next few years but we should be proud og our achievements. Happy New Year.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Peter at 10:48 am, Mon 31st Dec 2007
Dear Gordon Brown The diminishing band of us who are members of the Labour Party work voluntarily to get Labour candidates elected. Without wishing to sound churlish, shouldn't you have acknowledged
that contribution in your New Year message published on the Labour Party website? Wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that you have someone on your staff or at Labour Party HQ focussed on
rebuilding the Party? You promised in your paper: "Extending and renewing party democracy" to rebuild the Labour Party. A group of reasonably respected Labour Party members, who formed the LabOUR
Commission spent two years putting together constructive ideas to rebuild Labour as a mass membership force in British politics. Why not make it a New Year resolution to learn more about those
proposals, and task the new General Secretary with implementation? Peter Kenyon Save the Labour Party
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by John at 04:33 pm, Tue 1st Jan 2008
Yet more rhetoric Is this the start of tem nore years of talk but little action?
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by John Andrew Stanley at 10:57 pm, Mon 31st Dec 2007
Try to look on the bright side, things can only get better! With all the problems mounting here, there and everywhere GB is eventually going to need all the friends he can get, maybe the LP has a
chance to get in there and steer the rudderless ship? But how....that is the question and the challenge...Fabians/Progress/Compass loads of ideas but WHO is listening? Fraternally Jas
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive


For Britain, 2008 will be a year of real and serious changes.