Message posted by Jon at 10:23 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
I'll write to Brown and Straw directly, later, in response to green paper re Britain's system of governance ... just one point now, re workplace pensions (in Australia, "superannuation"): We've had
compulsory superannuation for many years, and now every employer is obliged to contribute a minimum of 9% of every employee's salary to their superannuation fund. It attracts tax benefits (the quid
pro quo being you can't access your benefits until you retire), and greatly increases the pool of savings, helping keep interest rates low. At the same time, the big industry-wide funds are jointly
managed by employers and unions in the industry, and attract competitive/healthy growth rates. But most of all, it's a no-fault system; I've been shocked to read about some Britons not being eligible
for a workplace pension because of the method of leaving their employment, whereas here the money is ours no matter what, and all we need to do to get it is to reach retirement age and retire. All
the best to all back home in Blighty, jon
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by rachael at 08:38 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
my government wants children to have the best start in life? you may want to look into the tax credits and how many people it's over paid who like my self are having to suffer financially due to
there error i have gone back to work part time 4 nights a week to make sure my son gets what he needs i can't work full time as we cannot afford the child care and will not recieve child tax credits
for a further two years due to there error and with the fuel prices going stupidly high i am finding it difficult to work as i am a care assistant who travels to their houses to supply care and if
the price of fuel keeps going up i will have to become unemployed as the money i earn has to go on rent and council tax and other bills and only work part time. its becoming ridiculous soon it will
be like a dog chasing its own tail
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Francis at 07:14 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
Planning: "quicker and more transparent" that is great but more important is that local authorities and local objectors are not disempowered but are assisted particularly on major projects to ensure
equality at arms between batteries of lawyers and expert witnesses against appearing against desperate groups of local residents
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by joan at 07:11 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
The Labour Government promised a referendum on the European Constitution. It has now been renamed the European Treaty but has exactly the same agenda as the Constitution. The future impact of this
treaty on the UK and its people is far too important to be decided by the Government especially as,according to the wording in the speech "legislation will be brought forward to approve the Treaty."
It therefore appears to be a foregone conclusion that it will be approved!!The people should decide by letting the referendum take place. The Labour Government should honour its promises.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by Louis Gregory John at 10:24 pm, Wed 7th Nov 2007
The new reform treaty will not, despite Tory propaganda and the scaremongering of much of the British media actually cause this colossal change in British life that is claimed. All the treaty will
actually do, when looked at, it ensure the EU can function effectively in the modern world and indeed provide a system upon which the EU can speak its mind in world affairs effectively. Furthermore
Britain had a referendum on the EU when we joined the union, this new treaty is simply an amendment on the original treaties not a dramatic change.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by MJ at 07:09 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
Re "reduce regulatory burdens on business" - many businesses (mine included) only exist because of regulations which allow us to operate - the Companies Act and so on - which were recently updated by
the Labour government. It is more important that we have the *right* regulation - regulation that is fit for purpose and means businesses are doing our country good - than simply to reduce
regulation. What will this line in the speech mean in practice? Is the Government planning to undo some of its hard work of the new Companies Act, or is there some other message here?
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by John Stewart at 05:39 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
Housing - Assisting first time buyers - this will be difficult to police and my understanding of market forces suggests that this is effectively increasing the supply of money not houses so will
result in increased prices for all. Consider taxing the increase in value of agricultural land arising from making it available for housing or other development. Such income could be ring-fenced to
pay for new infrastructure and affordable housing in the planning authority's area.
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive
Message posted by susan at 08:12 pm, Tue 6th Nov 2007
What exactly does it men by dormant bank accounts
Options: Reply to this message | Report this message as offensive

06 November 2007